@Joanna If I don’t travel outside the UK for holidays anymore or even do long journeys in the UK so I won’t physically be coming to any meeting in Paris any time soon but no great loss there.
@platypus a better idea and it means that US and Australian and … users can also join in if they so wish.
@black-raven I have taken the liberty of translating your post so that I can read it hopefully I got it all but not formatted as your original.
I stopped learning French at the age of 15 albeit I remembered enough that when doing an audit of a banking system in Arras by the end of the week I understood enough of a conversation between the customer’s technical support and their senior analyst to be able to interject my own comments, much to their surprise!
I got a better reception from the customer than I did from my French colleagues but that is another story!
Translation:-
Good morning,
This is my very first message on this forum and I don’t know if there is a presentation section…
I’ve been using DXO since Optics Pro 9 and have stuck with Photolab 5, FilmPack 6 and ViewPoint 3 (I’m on Windows).
Photolab corresponds to my way of working and I particularly like the quality of the final result, even if everything is not perfect, far from it. This is why the subject raised by Pat91 made me want to contribute here.
For years, there have been many things that have remained unchanged even though they exist among the competition. Here is a list of what I would like to see added or improved:
An automatic white balance option. It’s not much, but it would save a lot of photos. I mainly do wildlife photography in the undergrowth, and in the event of an incorrect white balance, the eyedropper is rarely effective in these conditions. This option exists in other software and I don’t see why DXO couldn’t implement it.
A more advanced curve tool with, why not, predefined curve shapes
Selective tone sliders that finally work in the right tonal ranges. This is a known and recognized problem and it turns out that in reality, its use is problematic.
A history that is preserved upon closing.
A Panorama tool as well as HDR fusion would delight landscapers.
I agree that the interface could use a little refreshing.
Personally, the tabbed layout suits me perfectly, but I find the font used to be too big. It lacks finesse and takes up a lot of space.
Furthermore, the software lacks responsiveness, even on large configurations.
As I said above, I stayed with version 5, because 6 did not meet my expectations, and 7 even less. And I’m not talking about petty pricing (luminosity mask in FP7, for example).
I think the DXO team needs to open their eyes and listen to their users.
Like Pat91, I work in IT (system/network administration) and I can assure you that software lacking in ergonomics is quickly abandoned.
This idea of meeting, physically and/or via video is an excellent idea and would, in my opinion, allow the DXO team to evolve without remaining stuck on its achievements.
Competition is progressing quickly and is questioning itself. If DXO wants to continue to sell and offer new things, it has no choice, it must listen.
My comments:-
Like you DxPL suits me better than any other editor I have tried, I can start and stop editing at any point and return, or not, when I desire.
The issues you raise are some that I would also raise but DxO appears to try to play catch and put a spin on it in an attempt to appeal to new users but they have fallen way behind in so many areas I am not sure that is actually possible!