I think its can’t be as its seems better to be a separated process (export under editing, queue, and as you write, not crash DxO editor process, etc). And i don’t think its can save resources in the end of the day, like masks need to re-created for export, etc.
From ChatGPT (i know, i know, its just ChatGPT), but may worth to mention:
Multi-GPU and Laptop Issues
Problem
- Systems with integrated + discrete GPUs (e.g., Intel + NVIDIA laptops) are unreliable.
As i see (read various forums, etc.), some case voodoo magic can happen if integrated + discrete exist in various software’s. If someone has also integrated and problems raised → than may worth to try to disable the integrated and see its helps on the issue or not.
Its may underrated point. Personally not a big believer it’s raise issues in this days ‘safe’ overclocking (like AMD Adrenaline Tuning - some auto settings), but still. And may many user not realize system is ‘factory’ overclocked (like run once and forgot it, etc.)
Bias example: “Sid Meier’s Civilization VI” is the most sensitive for overclocking in may PC - PL9 just fine in overclocked, Civ crash often.
@Wlodek I agree with @andras.csore keep it separate where I can see it and kill it
@andras.csore I have used ChatGPT to write PureBasic code and it can do an excellent job if I give it excellent and precise instructions, i.e. a bit more precise then “Write me a PureBasic program to read a file”. The only problem has been that it has confused the dialect of the Basic I am using and creates code for PowerBasic I think!?
I am not sure what you are suggesting with respect to my machines, both are hand built standalone Win 10 systems with AMD CPUs, Nvidia GPUs and an assortment of other similar but not identical components and Seasonic Platinum power supplies, 650W for the 5900X and 550W for 5600G.
The Nvidia drivers might be wrong, the DxO code might be wrong or both are, and I have no control over either except to see if it is possible to isolate and reproduce the problem(s)