You have to go back to post #18, where I tested this, as well to post #20.
- Assuming, that the new online user guide is not faulty, but tells us what DxO intended …(!),
.
we no more deal with a non-customizable PSC algorithm and a given result,
but a PSC slider in the softproof section, controlling oversaturation from 0 (no effect) to 100 (max).
.
The softproof’s task is to show, what we are going to expect … to then of course to get it!
That procedure fully works when exporting with “Same as Soft Proofing”,
but it doesn’t with choosing a matrix-based profile (+ checkbox),
which leads to a non-existing softproof – except when the PSC slider is set to 50 (default).
[ Possibly the default’s result is congruent with the former PSC algorithm one, but that’s not the point. ]
.
DxO introduced a PSC slider to control the oversaturation while in softproof – and that’s broken.
'Tis curious that “Red” is noted as “for paper” ?!
Red is used to highlight OoG colors in the destination gamut … but, that’s not limited to printing/paper only (or is it?).
Yes, I’ve seen that and it is the ‘same’ statement as in the ?-help.
-
“Rendering intent” and “Simulate paper & ink” are intended for printing,
while in fact the Rendering intents apply to all imported profiles
(no use of PSC slider = non variable). -
But the Destination gamut warning (red overlay) also works for matrix-based profiles.