I’d like to be able to reverse negatives within PL3 that I’m digitizing with the Nikon ES-2 and D750. The negative’s emulsion side is facing the camera so the shot isn’t taken through the film base which causes the image to be reversed.
I found a flip function in the Microsoft Photos app 10 minutes after posting here.
Will using that app as a last operation after exporting from PL3 degrade the quality of the image?
stuck
(Canon, PL7+FP7+VP3 on Win 10 + GTX 1050ti)
6
I must be missing something, surely you just need to mount the negative the other way round?
Mostly a 90 degrees rotation/flipping is just rearranging the pixels. When writing to disk as a jpg the image will be compressed again, when you use jpg. When you used tiff no problem.
I would rather suggest you to use IrfranView or XnViewMP as they surely have JPG lossless operations (both rotate and flip), which means no recompression and quality change in the file. This functions are in a separate menu.
As stated by George, it is not relevant for TIFF files.
But that would mean photographing through the film with the emulsion on the back (facing the camera), which can give a softer image.
My suggestion for a workaround would be to edit everything in the reversed sense, then export to a TIFF and reverse that outside of DxO. It’s not great but it’s possible. I am used to seeing all my images reversed on the ground glass screen of a large format film camera (5" x 4") so it’s a little easier to imagine the correct layout/cropping.
The problem then becomes one of having to store a TIFF as well as the original RAW. But you would have to do that if you were using Photoshop.
All film has the emulsion on the lens side, which means that you need to scan/photograph it from the emulsion side, which then appears reversed.
stuck
(Canon, PL7+FP7+VP3 on Win 10 + GTX 1050ti)
12
Ah yes, I was missing something, thank you.
I suppose so, I hadn’t thought of that even having read Joanna’s post. Next time I scan a slide I’ll experiment. However, as far as I know the instructions for my Nikon Coolscan VED are to insert the slide as you would view it, i.e. through the film / with the emulsion on the back. Given that I’d guess the device is optimised for that orientation.
After verification, I was indeed mistaken: with a scanner like the Nikon VED (which I also have), it is necessary to place the emulsion on the low side, ie in the direction of the scanning device. On a flatbed scanner (type Epson V500 / 700), it is the opposite.
Currently, I have abandoned (temporarily?) The VED scanner due to a change of PC: installation problems with the latest versions of Windows 10.
Now I “scan” with a macro lens: the advantage is that it is much faster and just as qualitative with the current sensor sizes. And above all it allows to have raw files to use directly in PhotoLab. The downside is that you cannot take advantage of the ICE to remove dust automatically.
I am not convinced that the emulsion / film orientation has a real importance for the sharpness of the image, at least with films not too old. I do not see a difference according to the direction with my macro lens device.
I think that the obligation to place the emulsion at the bottom with a VED is due to the internal Focus system which requires the emulsion side, and also the hardware ICE which can only work on this side. The V500 / 700 scanners only have a software ICE, and therefore do not have this obligation.
It is possible with both software.
You can also download ZIP only versions from both which you don’t need to install, only unzip to a folder and start.
Thanks for going through the effort to show me this Zoltan, I only looked at the feature list on the website homepage which listed rotate but not flip.
I’ll download this and try it.
stuck
(Canon, PL7+FP7+VP3 on Win 10 + GTX 1050ti)
20
Yes, do! Especially as your post reminds me that I think I had to re-install after my machine was updated from Win 10 1809 to 1903.