I was talking about the noname image.
I saw patterns on yours, but noname image does not seem to really show the same thing.
But anyway sharpening a noisy and slightly out focus image is maybe not a fair test.
Does this happen on tack sharp and fully denoised image ?
This is good to know. So Unsharp Mask is really legacy for images without a DXO module available for their camera/lens combination. I find I never use Unsharp Mask in DXO, and now I know why.
will be the same if you use USM outside of DxO … underlying problem is not USM… USM just makes it more visible
it does if you look @ 100% ( NOT IN browser - download original images and open @ 100% in photoshop or simular )
The topic of NOT using USM in DxO workflow for raw images that are fully supported (camera body & lens) is worth it’s own topic.
Anyone want to take that on?
are you taking on the merits of [ capture sharpening → creative sharpening → output sharpening ] stuff invented some 20+ years ago by certain old farts [ Martin Evening , Bruce Fraser , Seth Resnick , Andrew Rodney , Jeff Schewe , Mike Skurski ] to sell their PhotoKit Sharpener and books 
are you trying to start a fight?
long live USM !!!