Your GPU is an intel Iris Xe (80 EU) according to the specs I found online.
You have a roughly 30 megapixel image. CPU speed = 0.35 megapixel / sec. GPU speed = 0.86 megapixel / sec.
Cross check with my current notebook: Intel i7-10750H / RTX 2070 Max-Q:
Image is 51 megapixels: CPU speed = 124 sec. / = 0.41 megapixel / sec. GPU speed = 11 sec. / = 4.63 megapxel / sec
That’s what I feared. The old RTX 2070 is around 5 times faster than a current Intel Iris Xe which is still used in the Alder Lake 12th gen CPUs from intel.
Maybe we also get posts from people with other GPU / CPU constellations.
By the way reason for asking:
I like to know if the current generation of convertible notebooks (2 in 1) or Windows tablets might be fast enough for DXO RAW processing when on location. In that case I could get one of those new 16" two in ones and have a tablet, a notebook and a graphics tablet all in one device. But so far I can’t find reasonable benchmarks regarding DXO DeepPrime, so I tought best idea is to ask here.
(Sten-Åke Sändh (Sony, Win 11, PL 6, CO 16, PM Plus 6, XnView))
My new computer has Win 11, Intel i7 gen 12 with 16 MG RAM, 1TB SSD disk and Nvidia 3060 Ti graphics card which is good but not by any means top of the line.
I tested again with my 33 Megapixel images from my Sony A7 IV and it takes as an average 5 seconds to put out a JPEG in 100 quality and a file size of app. 35 MB. It´s a pretty significant improvement compared to my old computer with an old Intel i5 with 8 GB and a SATA 1 3 TB disk and a GPU from those days. Sometimes there is not all that much to wait for anymore because the new generation of PC:s and Mac:s are just so much faster. If you can afford it upgrade.
My current PC requires 19 min, 37 sec to process the Egypte photo in PrimeXD (PL6.2.0)
Specs are Lenovo Thinkpad X1 carbon - i7-8650 (1.90 GHZ) with 512 GB SSD, 16GB RAM, and UHD620 graphics (ultrabook integrated graphics).
This seems extremely slow when comparing the other benchmark results in the referenced spreadsheet and relative GPU benchmarks.
While I am in the market for a new PC, I wonder if there are other issues I should address in to help my current setup run faster.
I have tested setting the DeepPrime Acceleration to CPU only, GPU only, and Automatic with no significant effect. The cache is 5000mb, simultaneous images set to “2”. Both are default.
The Intel UHD620 graphics solution is a 6 year old low level integrated graphic solution chip with no onboard memory of its own. Your CPU will process DeepPRIME XD faster than your GPU and is being used even when you have explicitly selected the GPU. Unfortunately, the UHD620 is a chip rather than a dedicated graphics card and is simply not up to the task.
Is this a laptop or desktop? If a desktop you would benefit from even a few years old used GPU. If it’s a laptop there’s likely nothing you can do. Processing speed is not substantially affected by disk speed and you have enough memory. More memory isn’t gonna speed this up.
If you have manually selected GPU processing I would recommend you put it back on auto. The CPU will likely be faster than the GPU in your case.
Edit. I see it’s a laptop. Just save you cash until you’re in a position to get a new machine.