I disagree. PhotoLab is a tool, like any other tools, software or hardware. I performs a job (in my opinion better than other similar tools). It should be up to the user, me, whether or not to use it on a supported camera. Fortunately, all I need to do apparently is to use the EXIF editor tool to change the name of the camera, and PhotoLab opens the image and works as expected.
Because of this, I am forced to keep my other image editors around, as backups. I’ve got more editors than I can remember.
If I want to buy a micrometer and use it as a “glue clamp”, while it would be a totally stupid thing for me to do, it would do so. It’s up to the buyer/user what he wants to use his tools for, and while the glue clamp is a silly example, I have lots of tools that ended up being used for strange and unexpected purposes.
If I have an un-supported camera, “A”, and PhotoLab won’t open the files, if I rename my file to “B” which PhotoLab recognizes, and if I can then edit the file as expected, who am I hurting? I wish PhotoLab just posted a message that “A” was an un-supported camera, and opened the image anyway, just like I do by renaming the camera name.
I have several un-supported cameras, and I have lots of (mostly un-supported Voigtlander) lenses. Doing this my way means I haven’t opened up my other image editors in a year or two, maybe much longer…