In a perfect world that would be nice. Tell me what software is free of quirks and inconsistencies.
Mark
In a perfect world that would be nice. Tell me what software is free of quirks and inconsistencies.
Mark
That is certainly true. But Adobe and Phase 1 have also been around for a very long time. Are you suggesting their software has no issues? I was a software development manager and understand the pressures of getting a product to market. Often design decisions are made that don’t please everyone. minor bugs remain unfixed, etc. I try to focus more on big things that are being done really well rather than a few minor annoyances. In the case of the Color Rendering tool, I have never even thought of it as an issue…
Mark
Because that’s a generic version of the camera body (in many cases, a grouping of like models - not specific models) - - and not necessarily exactly the same as any specific camera’s actual rendering.
See here for more on this - - Note the observation by @Egregius/Greg.
John
Edit: I’ve just encountered an actual case-in-point (reinforcing my point);
Edit#2: The grouping for my Olympus OM-D E-M1 III has been moved around too - also with results (for the new grouping in which it now resides) now closer to the actual rendering for this body.
Attention between the generic rendering according to DxO (default) and the standard rendering according to the brand’s criteria.
Pascal
See
http://tuto.dxo.free.fr/EN/Efficacite/Efficiency.html#B16_Le_Rendu_des_couleurs
Cette pages existe aussi en français.