Support for Nikon Z cameras with FTZ-II adapter

Does anyone here use a Nikon Z-system mirrorless camera with F-series lenses on the FTZ-II adapter? Is this supported by PhotoLab, and does it assign the correct camera profile?

I’m planning to buy a Nikon Z6III and still have a lot of lenses from my old D850 that I’d like to continue using.

Yes, lenses on the FTZ are correctly recognized and corrected!

There are a few which aren’t, but with the Z6, the only old Nikon lens in my collection that doesn’t have a profile when used with the FTZ is the AF-D 16/2.8 fisheye.

Check the page for camera and lens support, so you will know exactly for your lenses!

1 Like

I have tried editing some of my older pictures where I had the Z9 connected to the 500 PF using the ftz - ii.

Photolab simply says Z9 with 500pf. No mention of the adapter at all. Pics seemed fine. (PL newb)

1 Like

Thank you for your quick replies. That makes my decision easier.

And with FTZ/FTZ-|| you loose autofocus on AF-D lenses (the AFD 16mm fisheye and 135/2D DC in my case). Otherwise it seems to work seamlessly, but I’ve tested it only with AFS 14-24/2.8G on Z8.

1 Like

Also yes. Z6ii and ftzzii.

George

1 Like

That’s mechanical focussing isn’t it.

George

No. AF works on F-mount cameras, while it doesn’t work on Z cameras via FTZ.

AF does work with a screw mechanisme. AF-S works with an in-build silent wave motor.
So your camera must have a screw mechanisme that serves the lens.

George

Sure. And there are many tiny FTZ pecularities described in ‘Compatible F Mount Lenses’, sometimes unexpected (e.g. remarks on ‘AF Speed’ in Custom Settings, with support for AF-S 24-70/2.8E ED VR but not for the preceding version, AF-S 24-70/2.8G).

EDIT: See Nikon | Download center | FTZ II

I don’t know what list you’re referring to.
But here the list from Nikon
https://www.nikonimgsupport.com/eu/BV_article?articleNo=000044900&lang=en_GB
I’ve the AF-S 28-70 1:2.8 D, the predecessor of the 24-70. The first one with AF-S and still working. And standard on the Z6ii with FTZii.

@Ralf_Brinkmann
I don’t know what camera you’re looking for but if you’re going for a DX camera, you won’t have IBIS. That’s only on the FX. My mentioned lens doesn’t have VR, on the Z6ii it has.

George

As I wrote in my initial post, I want to buy a Z6III and I still have a lot of old lenses, mostly S-Class, such as the 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, 80-400, 105 Macro as well as some Sigma lenses from the Art series.

If they fit, see the Nikon link, then you may have IBIS to. Not fully, just over 3 axes I believe. I don’t know the s-class.
I just came back from the shop to buy a Z6iii. I’ve to wait for e few days.

George

1 Like

From your list I have the following:

  • AF-S 14-24/2.8G ED (bought in 2008, “best but most rarely used lens”)
  • AF-S 24-70/2.8G ED (2008, original version of 24-70/2.8, not the second one)
  • AF-S VR 105/2.8G IF-ED (2008)
  • AF-S 70-200/2.8G ED VR (2010, second version of 70-200/2.8, not the third)
  • Sigma Art 35/1.4 DG (overhyped btw, imho)

I may test them with Z8, but it can take 2-4 days. Please let me know the lenses you are interested in and what to test.

If you are interested, I also have AF-S 24-120/4 (good but the Z version is by far better in almost every respect), AF Fisheye 16/2.8D (emergency pocket lens, sky colors), AF-S Micro 60/2.8G ED (flat focus plane), AF-DC 135mm/2D (old magic), AF-S 105/1.4E ED (new magic), AF-S 58/1.4G (special magic). I still use some of them on D780 or D4 but very rarely now.

Off-topic:
For Z 24-70/2.8 and 70-200/2.8, take second versions which have better AF, with 24-70/2.8S Mk2 being strangely better in almost every other feature. For 70-200/2.8S other differences seem to be quite subtle. Also Z70-200/2.8S v2 is not yet supported.

Plena (Z135/1.8S) is an absolute, universal magic, imho. AF much faster that AF-S 105/1.4E, enough even for slower sport action. But for portraits it works best when PL edits are combined with post-edits in Nik ColorEfex (e.g. slight diffusion in highlights) and C1 (Face Retouch, although using PL AI masks you can get near) :wink: Some may say it’s optically too perfect to have a character but I don’t read it that way.

Z35/1.2S, from the samples I’ve seen, looks like another magic, but 35mm primes are not in my genre.

For concerts, when 70-200/2.8 or 135/1.8 are not suitable, I’ve used my new Z85/1.2S. Too new to tell any story about it, but one has to keep in mind that Z85/1.2S vignetting is so strong at f/1.2 that you don’t get the ISO advantage at the borders over Plena, which exhibits much less vignetting at f/1.8 and renders light reflections from equipment more peacefully in general. So, if distance or capturing more context are non-issues, as for now I prefer Z135/1.8S over Z85/1.2S. Paradoxically, you need just a bit more light to take advantage of f/1.2, if looking for shallow DOF.

1 Like

As suggested, check …


and …

For my Nikon D750 I still own several F-type lenses (all AF-S, zoom and prime lenses, with a total focal length of 14 to 300 mm plus a TC-14EII), which all are fully supported and work equally well on my new Z6 III / FTZ II.

The Tokina F2.8 / 100mm macro lens is an exception. It receives the correct DxO lens profile, and the lens data is transferred correctly, including the effective aperture at close range. – But due to the older screw-driven AF, manual focus is required. Then I use the optional 100% view also for focusing, helpful for critical macro-level work.

My TC-14E ​​II is recognized as the (optically identical and supported) TC-14E ​​III. I use it with the F4 / 70-200 or 300mm lens.

Compared to my D750, the Z 6 III is lower in height, which affects holding comfort, especially with the F1.4 prime lenses, which now “extend” by 2.5 cm and feel somewhat front-heavy → I’m considering to add a SMALLRIG L-Shape Plate.


Also got a new cardreader CFexpress Type B / SD UHS-II (Model: WA-CXS08) from WISE Advanced Co.Ltd – all metal and connected via USB-C.

1 Like

Dear @Wlodek, thank you so much for your detailed reply. It’s very helpful. A test would be great, but it doesn’t matter which lens. I think if it works with one from the S-series, it will work with the others as well. I don’t have any really old lenses with screw-drive autofocus anymore. The only thing I’m unsure about is whether DxO has ever tested the (also newer) Sigma Art series lenses. I might have to find that out myself. Thanks anyway for the kind offer.

Hi @Wolfgang, thank you so much for your valuable advice. It really helps me with my decision. Of course, it would be great if I could just buy all the lenses new, but firstly, the really good ones are really expensive, and secondly, I probably won’t get much for my entire collection. So it’s probably best if I start with the FTZ adapter first. I can always buy more later. I’ll keep the card reader tip in mind as well.

Danke, Wolfgang

I had to search for it myself. But the s-line is a Z-line series lenses with pro quality. Something as the golden ring for the f-lenses.
I think you may say that if they work on the D850 they also work on the FTZ. Without warranty :face_without_mouth:

George

1 Like

Then you will absolutely be fine. They work even BETTER on a Z body with the FTZ, than they did on a D body (more accurate focusing).

Just be aware that sooner or later you will replace at least some of these lenses with native Z ones, which are even better, and lighter in weight. At least, that’s what happened to me!

2 Likes

I’m sure the same will happen to me. But one thing at a time, step by step. Today I bought the Z6III and the FTZII adapter. The battery is charging right now.