Should PhotoLab do everything that other tools do?

What about more and better than others ? :grin:

What is important for me is that DxO do not rush things but make them perfectly because there is nothing worst than having a poor, slow and buggy software.

In my opinion the priorities should be:

  1. stability: bug fixes as soon as possible, as often as necessary.
  2. performances: make it fast, make it a bliss to use. Most of us have computers with much power that is not fully used.
  3. new functionalities: without borders, just add, but do it thinking of a whole and respecting point 1 and 2. I guess this is what is going on since the name changed from DxO Optics to PhotoLab.
    Of course, the main business of PL: Raw Development and picture quality should always be at the core and emphasized.

I also like the fact that we users can participate and influence the tools we will use tomorrow.

3 Likes