PhotoLab 8: Performance Improvements? Better on Apple Silicon?

Regular backups are a good idea anyways :wink:

Nevertheless, if you’re ready to trash the DB regularly, you need not worry about restoring a DB. If you’ve used it for a long tome, it might have wandered off and list files that have moved or been deleted while DPL was closed. In such a case, you’d also restore the mismatches. PhotoLab has no built-in functionality that checks for such mismatches, but DxO might be working on it silently and come up with something in a few weeks/months/ears/millennia…

Hello,

Briefly my experience with the hardware and PL 8 and also Viewpoint5

Currently using a slightly older HP workstation with W10

Processor Xeon w2133 (6 Core), 32GB RAM, SSDs (SATA and NVME), RTX 3060 12GB RAM, PCIE 3

Monitor 2560x1600 and 1280x1600

Start time of PL8 until you can work about 20 seconds.

But then everything goes very smoothly, hardly any delays.

I suspect that loading the profiles also takes time. Currently using 3 DSLRs with about 8 different lenses. Displays about 30 profiles.

I currently have frequent approx. 50 MB RAW files from a 32Mpix DSLR in progress.

Export mostly in JPG, and often 5 to 10 images in a row. Even with Prime XD, this rarely takes more than half a minute.

I’ve been using DXO for a long time, I think DXO Optics Pro v3.x was my first version.

Apart from the slightly long start-up time, there’s hardly any unpleasant performance limitation. PL8 takes a little longer than PL7 to launch.

Prime XD is a bit faster, but I recently upgraded from a GTX 1065 to the RTX 3060.

1 Like

….after 9 years w/o change I‘m upgrading to a Mac Mini M4 Pro, 64 GB RAM, 1 TB SSD, 14 Core CPU / 20 Core GPU with 2 external Samsung 990 Pro 4 TB SSD‘s plus a ZikeDrive USB4 for each SSD.

On the monitor I haven‘t finally decided yet - probably I‘ll go for an EIZO ColorEdge CS2731.

Does anyone have a suggestion on the EIZO ColorEdge CS2731? This monitor is not brandnew, but 4k (CS2740) is probably not helpful for 27 inch?

A year ago I switched from 24" FullHD to 27" 4k (CS2740), costing me a good lens. With 164 ppi at 50-60 cm distance, it’s perfect for me, no turning back. The 27" size is the maximum I would use. The drawback of 4k was that I soon switched from 16/24mpx camera combo to 45mpx :wink:

1 Like

Thanks a lot! So the 2560 x 1440 pixel resolution (CS2731) was no option for you obviously. I‘m just thinking because of some people mentioned the size of the text in the menues is very small with 4k…

After Win11 installation, I switched the setting System->Display->Scale from recommended 150% to 175%. No problems with that so far, even with my old eyes. It’s a personal thing, so better check yourself.

1 Like

Indeed my eyes are also 50+ :wink: So I will then also look deeper into the 4k version.

I had the EIZO CG242W and an LG monitor together on the system.

I replaced this with an EIZO FexScan EV3895 two years ago.

Features: 37.5 inches, 24:10 Curved Ultrawide shade.

3840 x 1600 pixels, 111 ppi

Docking function via USB-C

KVM switch function

I am currently running the W10 with 2560 x 1600 as main screen and 1280 x 1600 as second screen

Display setting of Windows is 100%

I have no problem with the display of PL 8. On the right side I can show almost all panels.

I think you lose projects.