do we have a chance to climb up in the agile develop process with 44 votes . At the moment I develop a lot of lost spaces photos an it’s a nightmare to compare these photos after developing with different methods. And like @Tom says jumping back and forward takes a lot of time.
Thanks for your attention
I’ll throw in my 2 cents…obviously each individual places his or her own value on using a DAM. For me, it is a useful tool. Having used iMatch for a while I’d say it easily meets the basic or advanced needs of anyone. The focus in this thread is comparing images. Imatch can compare 2, 3 or even 4 pictures on the same page. IMO, it’s worth taking a look at.
Hi there,
Side-by-side comparison, like 2 or more images, is something which is still missing in PhotoLab.
We want to have it too, but I would be surprised if we’ll be able to “squeeze” it in our current scheduled development timeline.
Apple’s Aperture allowed side-by-side viewing of processed raw images at arbitrary magnification with synchronized scrolling of the two. This was 10 years ago…
I believe it will be very useful for culling. I own a license to both FastRawViewer and Fastone. I tended to use FastStone for culling because of its compare feature which the earlier version of FRV lacked.
Mark.
1 Like
m-photo
( Marc (macOS Sonoma on MBP16" Intel))
55
Exactly !
I am surprised by the lack of notifications… not a single site I visit regularly talked about it !
Here a blog post with interesting informations, you can even trial test V2 for 60 days to see if you need the update or not.