9,10 out yesterday

9,10 has an even bigger number of extra down loads and a long optimisation on 1st boot. Has a actual list of bugs sorted as well.

Its needing a lot of HDD, on my laptop 5.3Gb in programs and 5.1Gb in local

1 Like

PhotoLab (Mac) versions that got updated::

My big ones are in users not programs

The masking on my imac is now even more sluggish, especially when using the brush to erase parts of a mask. I really do believe my days here are over

I can’t export to jpg with version: 9.10.0.736 anymore. Reinstalling version 9.10.0.736 with the repair option did not help. Back to version: 9.8.1.679.

SOLVED by changing windows ML Acceleration→Max performances

to windows ML Acceleration→Compatibility mode.

preferences/performance settings

===========================================================================

Part of logfile “DxO.PhotoLab.txt”

2026-07-18 14:00:11.987 | DxO.PhotoLab - 29052 - 20 | Processing - Error | Error while processing item ‘D:_Foto’s- Sony RX100M6\2026-07-15 - Spakenburg Molen\DSC06867.ARW’
2026-07-18 14:00:11.988 | DxO.PhotoLab - 29052 - 20 | Processing - Error | DxONET.CorrectionEngine.Engine.NativeEngineException: Internal error (Correction failed on the Execute stage)
Exception: DxONET.CorrectionEngine.Engine.NativeEngineException Internal error (Correction failed on the Execute stage)
2026-07-18 14:00:11.988 | DxO.PhotoLab - 29052 - 20 | DopCommon - Error | Error in progression
Exception: DxO.PhotoLab.Export.Common.Tasks.ProcessingException Internal error (Correction failed on the Execute stage)
DxONET.CorrectionEngine.Engine.NativeEngineException Internal error (Correction failed on the Execute stage)

1 Like

May upload raw + dop - and others can try its works for them or not.

1 Like

Pas plus de 50 images exportées !!! l’export vers tiff ou jpeg ne fonctionne plus ! Merci à nouveau DxO :face_with_symbols_on_mouth:

1 Like

No problems for me to export jpeg from NEF, tried with 52 photos

Mmmm - I may have been premature! After a couple of reboots things seem acceptable again so will keep testing. I do worry what v10 will bring though - perhaps I am too much of a pessimist.

Tried with 2x750 photos (Tiff +Jpeg) , crashes after about 300 exports

May this thread can be interesting (WIndows). Its about export 100’s photos. However, it was PL 9.2.1 times.

I like to note: im export in one session (PL 9.x) 20mpx raw to jpg in 700-1000 photos with basic correction like: exposure, contrast, geometry but without NR. I do it for preview jpg for easier culling.

The export problem is SOLVED by changing windows ML Acceleration→Max performances to windows ML Acceleration→Compatibility mode in the preferences/performance settings.

1 Like

What GPU and driver do you use?
Are there any errors in Windows EventLog or DxO crash dumps?

I am using the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GPU with driver version 32.0.31021.5001.

See my first post with the error extract from the logfile.

windows error:

Toepassingsnaam met fout: DxO.PhotoLab.ProcessingCore.exe, versie: 9.10.20642.736, tijdstempel: 0x9a452546
Naam van foutmodule: ucrtbase.dll, versie: 10.0.26100.8875, tijdstempel: 0x303b538a
Uitzonderingscode: 0xc0000409
Foutoffset: 0x00000000000a527e
Foutproces-id: 0xAD4
Begintijd van foutieve toepassing: 0x1DD16D61F09250F
Faulting-toepassingspad: C:\Program Files\DxO\DxO PhotoLab 9\DxO.PhotoLab.ProcessingCore.exe
Faulting-modulepad: C:\WINDOWS\System32\ucrtbase.dll
Rapport-id: fee373e0-d22c-4317-a14c-9a0b9c8fbdee

Thanks for solving this problem for me.

Photolab has grown quite a lot since last year.
Is that because of bigger AI-models?
Will that cause more sluggish performance?

On Windows 11 so far I have found that 9.10 to be much quicker to find AI subjects and to export. Very happy with the improvements.

2 Likes

Lovely! Finally it is flowing in the right direction.

1 Like

Another thing I noticed with this update is that there was quite a comprehensive list of bugs fixed. This is the first time I have seen this. Something good is finally happening at DxO :slightly_smiling_face:

2 Likes

I think the disaster of the launch of 9 may have made DXO realise they have to change, well a bit, if they were to retain customers. They may even restart numbering the install programs again!

1 Like