9,10 has an even bigger number of extra down loads and a long optimisation on 1st boot. Has a actual list of bugs sorted as well.
Its needing a lot of HDD, on my laptop 5.3Gb in programs and 5.1Gb in local
9,10 has an even bigger number of extra down loads and a long optimisation on 1st boot. Has a actual list of bugs sorted as well.
Its needing a lot of HDD, on my laptop 5.3Gb in programs and 5.1Gb in local
My big ones are in users not programs
The masking on my imac is now even more sluggish, especially when using the brush to erase parts of a mask. I really do believe my days here are over
I can’t export to jpg with version: 9.10.0.736 anymore. Reinstalling version 9.10.0.736 with the repair option did not help. Back to version: 9.8.1.679.
SOLVED by changing windows ML Acceleration→Max performances
to windows ML Acceleration→Compatibility mode.
preferences/performance settings
===========================================================================
Part of logfile “DxO.PhotoLab.txt”
2026-07-18 14:00:11.987 | DxO.PhotoLab - 29052 - 20 | Processing - Error | Error while processing item ‘D:_Foto’s- Sony RX100M6\2026-07-15 - Spakenburg Molen\DSC06867.ARW’
2026-07-18 14:00:11.988 | DxO.PhotoLab - 29052 - 20 | Processing - Error | DxONET.CorrectionEngine.Engine.NativeEngineException: Internal error (Correction failed on the Execute stage)
Exception: DxONET.CorrectionEngine.Engine.NativeEngineException Internal error (Correction failed on the Execute stage)
2026-07-18 14:00:11.988 | DxO.PhotoLab - 29052 - 20 | DopCommon - Error | Error in progression
Exception: DxO.PhotoLab.Export.Common.Tasks.ProcessingException Internal error (Correction failed on the Execute stage)
DxONET.CorrectionEngine.Engine.NativeEngineException Internal error (Correction failed on the Execute stage)
May upload raw + dop - and others can try its works for them or not.
Pas plus de 50 images exportées !!! l’export vers tiff ou jpeg ne fonctionne plus ! Merci à nouveau DxO ![]()
No problems for me to export jpeg from NEF, tried with 52 photos
Mmmm - I may have been premature! After a couple of reboots things seem acceptable again so will keep testing. I do worry what v10 will bring though - perhaps I am too much of a pessimist.
Tried with 2x750 photos (Tiff +Jpeg) , crashes after about 300 exports
May this thread can be interesting (WIndows). Its about export 100’s photos. However, it was PL 9.2.1 times.
I like to note: im export in one session (PL 9.x) 20mpx raw to jpg in 700-1000 photos with basic correction like: exposure, contrast, geometry but without NR. I do it for preview jpg for easier culling.
The export problem is SOLVED by changing windows ML Acceleration→Max performances to windows ML Acceleration→Compatibility mode in the preferences/performance settings.
What GPU and driver do you use?
Are there any errors in Windows EventLog or DxO crash dumps?
I am using the AMD Radeon RX 9070 GPU with driver version 32.0.31021.5001.
See my first post with the error extract from the logfile.
windows error:
Toepassingsnaam met fout: DxO.PhotoLab.ProcessingCore.exe, versie: 9.10.20642.736, tijdstempel: 0x9a452546
Naam van foutmodule: ucrtbase.dll, versie: 10.0.26100.8875, tijdstempel: 0x303b538a
Uitzonderingscode: 0xc0000409
Foutoffset: 0x00000000000a527e
Foutproces-id: 0xAD4
Begintijd van foutieve toepassing: 0x1DD16D61F09250F
Faulting-toepassingspad: C:\Program Files\DxO\DxO PhotoLab 9\DxO.PhotoLab.ProcessingCore.exe
Faulting-modulepad: C:\WINDOWS\System32\ucrtbase.dll
Rapport-id: fee373e0-d22c-4317-a14c-9a0b9c8fbdee
Thanks for solving this problem for me.
Photolab has grown quite a lot since last year.
Is that because of bigger AI-models?
Will that cause more sluggish performance?
On Windows 11 so far I have found that 9.10 to be much quicker to find AI subjects and to export. Very happy with the improvements.
Lovely! Finally it is flowing in the right direction.
Another thing I noticed with this update is that there was quite a comprehensive list of bugs fixed. This is the first time I have seen this. Something good is finally happening at DxO ![]()
I think the disaster of the launch of 9 may have made DXO realise they have to change, well a bit, if they were to retain customers. They may even restart numbering the install programs again!